Why Vote?
Now that all the election stuff is over, at least till 2008, I want to address this question. It seems too many people in any general election, think that their vote does not count. Many feel that Presidential elections should be on the popular vote and that the Electoral College has out lived it's usefulness. If that is the case then there would be no need for Presidential Candidates to campaign any where but large population centers New York, LA, Chicago Philadelphia ect. No need to even visit Vermont, Montana, or any state with a low population center. That being said I would like to see better choices on the ballot. I no longer want to choose between the lesser of two evils but have a real choice, like when Ross Perot ran. All the independent candidates just seem to be so far from main stream that they will never get my vote. I would like to see a box saying none of the above just one year and maybe after None won we could get viable candidates. Now the only reason I vote is so I can complain. Happy politicing!
posted by Old Army | 6:24 AM
2 Comments:
Why not "None of the Above" (NOTA) on the ballot? In a democracy, government must obtain the consent of the governed. All legitimate consent requires the ability to withhold consent. A binding NOTA on the ballot enables voters to withhold their consent in an election to office, just as voters can cast a "No" vote on a ballot question.
Any state could enact a Voter Consent law requiring a votable line, "None of the Above" (NOTA), at the end of the candidate list for each office, giving voters the ballot option to reject all candidates for an office. If NOTA gets more votes than any candidate for that office, then no candidate is elected and a new by-election, with new candidates, is called fill such offices. While NOTA by-elections are an expense, they would not occur unless voters voted to hold them, and they are likely to be less costly than electing unacceptable candidates to office. An example of Voter Consent legislation with a binding NOTA ballot option can be found at http://www.nota.org/notabill
With a NOTA ballot option, voters make the final decision about the choices political parties made, rather than those parties deciding the final choices voters can make. Even candidates running unopposed would have to obtain voter consent to be elected. And all political parties would know their selected candidates must face NOTA as well as any opponent, reducing the incentives for negative campaigning and "lesser evil" candidates. Buying "access" to candidates or determining election outcomes with contributions becomes a more uncertain enterprise. Surely a Voter Consent law will not solve all the problems with democratically governing ourselves; however, it seems to me a reasonable, fair, and workable improvement, returning some power to "We the People", from whom our constitution draws its legitimacy, and taking some power from political parties and corporations, whom our constitution never mentions.
In the meantime, for voters who do not vote for any candidate for an office, or do not vote at all, because of dissatisfaction with all candidates, I suggest voting and writing-in "None of the Above" as a clear way to withhold consent as well as to call for enactment of a Voter Consent law.
Thanks for the response. I will check out the site. I just get so frustrated with people that complain but never vote.
Post a Comment
<< Home